tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5479847193762153273.post2198009005017807273..comments2024-03-11T02:32:15.295-04:00Comments on Goblin Artisans: CCDD 011416—EnhanceUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5479847193762153273.post-17961933855896853332016-01-16T20:24:47.595-05:002016-01-16T20:24:47.595-05:00Oh, huh, weird!Oh, huh, weird!Tommy Occhipintihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13495646355536064735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5479847193762153273.post-35748148110566032032016-01-15T10:36:00.195-05:002016-01-15T10:36:00.195-05:00Not this one?
http://goblinartisans.blogspot.com/2...Not this one?<br />http://goblinartisans.blogspot.com/2016/01/ccdd-011216mentor.html?showComment=1452631589723#c5789264424649685643Jay Treathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09428861685923241850noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5479847193762153273.post-2288581035407366002016-01-14T18:00:44.184-05:002016-01-14T18:00:44.184-05:00Very Melviny. Has the bonus over old versions tha...Very Melviny. Has the bonus over old versions that you could print it at common (which I had a lengthy comment about that got eaten).Tommy Occhipintihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13495646355536064735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5479847193762153273.post-15478468263323030812016-01-14T12:23:13.781-05:002016-01-14T12:23:13.781-05:00Thank you!
I liked the approaches you took here.Thank you!<br /><br />I liked the approaches you took here.Jack (cartesiandaemon)https://www.blogger.com/profile/08258267965242039995noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5479847193762153273.post-4503782800501062372016-01-14T12:02:20.746-05:002016-01-14T12:02:20.746-05:00Two or Three counters might prove correct. Only pl...Two or Three counters might prove correct. Only playtesting could say.<br /><br />Your other two suggestions seem pretty good.Jay Treathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09428861685923241850noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5479847193762153273.post-19407417071778018412016-01-14T11:43:51.545-05:002016-01-14T11:43:51.545-05:00Ooh, yes, "with counters on" is an inter...Ooh, yes, "with counters on" is an interesting take. That does allow multiple ways of turning them on.<br /><br />Although, I think that four counters is still quite a hurdle: most of those are going to be creatures, with the exception of a few artifacts that accumulate charge counters, and turn-on keywords like Ferocious could be triggered by a much greater proportion of cards. And the rewards don't seem commensurately greater. Would it be better with "two counters" or "four counters across any number of permanents"?<br /><br />Or I guess it could be something else planeswalkers do. "If you control a non-creature permanent with CMC 4+"? "If you activated a non-creature non-mana activated ability this turn"? I don't know if that's a good idea but it's where it took me.Jack (cartesiandaemon)https://www.blogger.com/profile/08258267965242039995noreply@blogger.com