This week, I've got a theme: Learning. There are five steps in the process of truly learning something and I'll be discussing one each day.Choose to Learn | Don't Take Notes | Try it Out | Play with Alternatives | Teach It
Teach It (Part 5 of 5)
My evidence for the necessity of this final step is purely empirical, but I've so much of it that I am nonetheless confident. Why there are two always, a master and a student? Because you cannot be a master without a student. Er, because you cannot a master be, a student without?
It's funny, when we are taught in school that a blacksmith must start as an apprentice and work his way to journeyman before he can graduate to being a master blacksmith himself, it's obvious why the apprentice is taking on this arduous task despite the relative shame of being somebody's lesser for a decade or so (at least, that's how I imagine most Americans feel about it), but we don't really think about the master's motivation. Is she in it for the free labor or the pride of having a voluntary subordinate? Probably, but perhaps the larger motivation is that taking on and training an apprentice is the final requirement in becoming a master of the art, both in social perception and in practice.