 "Red can't destroy creatures" is a well-accepted part of the color pie, but cards like Haphazard Bombardment and Shifting Shadow show that certain kinds of designs can get around that. By playing up red's random, unreliable, risky nature they turn what would otherwise be a color pie break into an acceptable color pie bend. Today's design is another attempt to play around in that space.
"Red can't destroy creatures" is a well-accepted part of the color pie, but cards like Haphazard Bombardment and Shifting Shadow show that certain kinds of designs can get around that. By playing up red's random, unreliable, risky nature they turn what would otherwise be a color pie break into an acceptable color pie bend. Today's design is another attempt to play around in that space.One concern I have is that the simplified design might not fit red's color pie anymore. "Delayed destroy" of a creature arguably belongs in black or even white. On the other hand, the closest real card to this is a red design: Consuming Ferocity. (See what I mean about needlessly complicated implementations?)
 

 
I like it, but as you said, it belongs to black or white. Dealing damage equal to the number of counters on upkeep is a walkaround.
ReplyDeleteIt makes me wonder about designing a card on the dynamite stick being tossed around while its fuse is shortening. What mechanic would best capture that essence?